We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is a Retinal Transplant?

By Emma Miller
Updated Mar 03, 2024
Our promise to you
The Health Board is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At The Health Board, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A light-sensitive tissue located in the inner surface of the eye, the retina is crucial to sharp central vision. A number of disorders — some degenerative — can affect the retinas. In cases where visual acuity has been severely damaged and no other therapeutic interventions are available, a retinal transplant may be attempted in an effort to improve vision.

In order to achieve visual perception, images seen by the eyes’ lenses are focused on the retinas, which then convert the pictures into electrical impulses and transmit them to the brain through the optic nerve. Healthy retinal tissue is typically red due to an abundance of blood vessels that supply it with nutrients. An ophthalmologist can easily examine the retina during a routine eye test. Changes in retinal tissue color may be indicative of disease. A number of diseases can damage the retina, including retinitis pigmentosa and macular degeneration.

The transplantation of retinal tissue is an experimental procedure, used only when all other treatment options have been exhausted, and in cases where there is extensive tissue damage and complete vision loss. Two types of transplant options exist, whole retina and stem cell transplants. Stem cell transplants have proven unsuccessful, as the cells seem to fail to differentiate into retinal cells, a process needed for visual improvement. Clinical trials involving the transplantation of a small piece of whole retinal tissue have proven moderately successful, with a large percentage of patients experiencing a degree of visual acuity improvement. It is thought that transplanted cells may eventually replace the patient’s damaged cells.

A number of concerns exist regarding retinal transplants, as the tissue used in the clinical trials usually comes from aborted fetuses. Approval to replicate the technique on a larger scale, using fetal tissue may pose an ethical issue. Medical studies indicate that transplanted retinas may release growth factors into the recipient’s eyes and this may help their own retinal cells recover from damage. It is therefore unclear whether whole retinal tissue transplants are necessary for visual improvement. Improvements in visual acuity are typically reversed one to two years post-retinal transplant, although in isolated cases they have lasted up to six years following treatment.

No immunosuppressant medications seem to be required after a retinal transplant, and, according to medical studies, there have been no cases of rejection of transplanted tissue. The procedure is experimental. More research is needed to determine the retinal transplant method that is safest and that offers the best sustainable visual acuity improvement.

The Health Board is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Discussion Comments
By anon926904 — On Jan 21, 2014

The assertion that tissue in trials comes from aborted fetuses is not very accurate as one very prominent clinical trial extracts single cells from embryos which does not cause any damage and it can continue on its normal pattern of development.

I suggest whoever wrote this article should do their research a little better before stating such a biased message appearing to align with so called "pro-lifers" and creating a negative image of science. Disappointing.

The Health Board, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

The Health Board, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.