What is the Pathophysiology of Lung Cancer?
The pathophysiology of lung cancer is a complicated issue. Genes that are influenced in the pathogenesis of lung cancer are proteins that are involved in a variety of processes including cell growth and differentiation, cell cycle processes, and angiogenesis, which is the formation of new blood vessels. The proteins also play a role in tumor progression, immune regulation, and apoptosis. Since the cells involved are complex and have such a broad range of functions, the pathophysiology of lung cancer has been hard to determine precisely.
It is estimated that up to 90% of all lung cancer cases are the result of cigarette smoking. Lung cancer accounts for the majority of all cancers worldwide, in both men and women. Besides cigarette smoking, other tobacco products such as pipe tobacco and cigars also contribute to the pathophysiology of lung cancer. Other toxins, such as radon, arsenic, and asbestos also seem to play a role, as does second-hand smoke. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that approximately 1.2 million cases of cancer worldwide are due to lung cancer.
There are other contributing risk factors as well including diet, genetic disposition, and possible pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). A diet high in fat intake has been found to contribute to an increased risk. Conversely, a diet high in fruits and vegetables has been associated with a reduced risk.
Lung cancers are generally classified as either small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Non-small cell lung cancers account for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. NSCLCs are further divided into three sub-categories: adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. Adenocarcinoma is the most common type of NSCLC among non-smokers. SCLC is the lung cancer most associated with smoking, and almost all patients who have SCLC have a history of smoking.
Regardless of the classification, the cancer that arises in the lung is the result of normal mucosal cells mutating into malignant cell structures. The pathophysiology of lung cancer is a very complex course, influenced by many factors. Progress is being made in understanding this very complex pathophysiological system, and as risk factors are identified and preventative measures are implemented, the medical community's knowledge and ability to prevent, diagnose, and treat lung cancers is also growing. Once some of the processes the genes and cells go through have been recognized, therapies and early detection will be possible.
@Tomislav - That is a common misconception that only smoking causes lung cancer. I have a friend as well suffering from lung cancer, and they are actually sponsoring a local run to get the message out.
Their hope is that the more people know about the risk, the better chances people will go get screened, and the more people who get screened increases the chance that people might have their cancer found earlier.
With finding most cancers earlier it increases the likelihood of a good outcome!
@Tomislav - I am surprised if they were discussing the pros and cons of smoking marijuana that they did not discuss the possibility of lung cancer.
Studies always show a range of results but studies have shown a link between the two. I do not know that much about it, but I do remember something being said about the amount of marijuana affected the outcome in some studies.
But from what I remember there are more ways to get the helpful effects for people that are smoking marijuana without smoking it, right?
Either way I would imagine people with terminal diseases who are using marijuana to deal with the extreme pain are not as concerned with the possibility of lung cancer especially considered the jury is still out as far as certainty goes.
I was very intrigued when I found out a co-worker's husband had lung cancer and had not smoked a cigarette a day in his life. I had always thought the two were synonymous. But now I can see why I thought it was synonymous with 90% of the cases being correlated to smoking.
I was just watching a show the other day where people were discussing legalizing marajuana, and one of the arguments against it was that it was smoked and people felt this cannot mean good things.
Does anyone know if in people that smoke marajuana for medical purposes have an increased risk for lung cancer?
Post your comments